The short answer: for a startup's first pilot or clinical build, brief Nortech Systems, Medical Murray, Viant and Pathway MedTech first, because each one states in writing that it takes startup or low volume device work. Nortech goes furthest and lets a startup without a mature quality system run its development under Nortech's ISO 13485 system. If you need a US only build, Medical Murray, Pathway MedTech and HDA Technology publish US only footprints. For Class III and implantable programs at scale, Integer, Viant, Cirtec and Nordson state Class III experience. And before you sign with anyone, read the terms of sale, because two of the largest firms publish terms that make the tooling theirs even when you paid for it.
We built this comparison by reading 19 medical device contract manufacturing companies' own websites and published terms of sale in September 2026. None of them publishes an engineering (NRE) fee, a unit price or a production lead time for a custom device, so this is not a price ranking. It is a ranking of what they do put in writing: device class, cleanroom class, startup stance, where the plants are and who owns the tooling. The full buyer's guide, including what FDA registration does and does not prove, is on our medical device contract manufacturers page.
Medical device contract manufacturing companies, compared on what they publish
| Company | Where it builds | Device class, as stated | Startup stance, as stated | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nortech Systems | Minnesota, plus Monterrey and Suzhou | Class I, II, III | Startups can use its ISO 13485 development system as their own | Electromechanical startups without a quality system |
| Medical Murray | North Barrington and Lake Zurich, IL | Not stated; implants and catheters | Startups to largest OEMs; single lot pilot builds | Catheters and clinical trial builds, US only |
| Viant | 26 sites, US plus Mexico, Costa Rica, China, Europe | Class I, II, III and combination | Early stage startups; low volume prototype runs | A partner that can scale from prototype to high volume |
| Pathway MedTech | Santee, CA | Not stated | Volumes too small for traditional CMs | Verification builds and early NPI, US only |
| Cirtec Medical | US, plus Costa Rica and Germany | Class II and III | Emerging startups alongside OEMs | Active implantables and neuromodulation |
| HDA Technology | Lake Forest, CA | Not stated | Ten units or ten thousand | Small electronic devices needing IEC 60601 testing |
| Cadence | Virginia, Pennsylvania, Costa Rica and more | Class I and II | A few hundred units or millions annually | Class I and II single use devices with managed sterilization |
| Integer | US, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Uruguay, Ireland, Malaysia | Class II and III focus | Not stated | Established programs needing a quality agreement culture |
| Jabil, Flex, Sanmina, Plexus | Global networks | Mostly not stated | No startup program published | Large electromechanical programs at volume |
Nortech Systems: the one that lends a startup its quality system
Nortech, headquartered in Maple Grove, Minnesota, says the thing most first time device founders need to hear: startups lacking a formal or experienced quality system can rely on Nortech's ISO 13485 certified product development quality system as their own. For a company with a working prototype and no quality manager, that is a real shortcut, because design controls have to live somewhere before verification builds start.
It states that it designs, develops and manufactures Class I, II and III devices, and it points low volume, high mix work to its Mankato and Bemidji sites. The Milaca site is the one it names as FDA registered with a Class 7 cleanroom. Two things to check. Its Monterrey plant lists ISO 9001 and AS9100D rather than ISO 13485, and Nortech itself says its China and Mexico facilities take production once volumes reach a higher threshold. So ask which site your build moves to at scale, and whether that site carries the certificate your submission relies on.
Medical Murray: pilot builds for clinical trials, all in Illinois
Medical Murray states it works with customers from startups to the largest OEMs and runs low volume pilot production for clinical trials, including single lot orders on tight deadlines. Both of its Illinois facilities are FDA registered and ISO 13485:2016 certified, it runs ISO Class 7 cleanrooms, and all packaging is done in an ISO Class 7 environment. It lists process validations (IQ, OQ, PQ), test method validation and sterilization validation for EO, gamma or e-beam, which it manages through validated partners rather than in house.
The work it describes is implants, delivery systems and complex catheters, and it supports IDE, 510(k) and PMA submissions. If you are building a catheter based device and want the whole program under one US roof through first in human, this is the natural first call.
Viant: says yes to startups, and owns the tooling
Viant, based in Foxborough, Massachusetts, answers the startup question directly on its own site: it partners with device companies of all sizes, from early stage startups to established OEMs, and supports low volume prototype runs through high volume commercial production. It states Class I, II, III and combination devices, ISO 13485 with MDSAP, and ISO 7 and ISO 8 cleanrooms across 26 locations.
Read its quotation terms before you sign. They state that tooling made by the seller is proprietary to the seller, that payment is net 30 after shipment, and that prices are based on assumptions about annual demand, minimum order quantities and tooling. None of that is unusual for a molder of Viant's size. It simply means the price you are quoted holds only while your volumes match the forecast, and that moving the product later means a new tool. Negotiate both points into the supply agreement if they matter to you.
Pathway MedTech and HDA Technology: small, US only, built for early volume
Pathway MedTech in Santee, California describes itself as intentionally structured to support low to mid volume new product introduction and device verification manufacturing, and it names its customer plainly: production volumes too small for traditional contract manufacturers. It is ISO 13485:2016 certified with ISO Class 7 cleanroom manufacturing, plans IQ, OQ and PQ early, and coordinates EO, gamma or e-beam cycle validation.
HDA Technology in Lake Forest, California is ISO 13485:2016 certified, FDA registered and registered with the California Food and Drug Branch, and it says it will build ten units or ten thousand. It lists IEC 60601 testing and validation, which makes it a sensible first call for a small electrical device. Neither publishes a device class, a cleanroom class (HDA) or a price, so bring your class and quantities to the first call.
Cirtec, Integer and Nordson: Class III depth
If your device is implantable or life sustaining, class depth matters more than startup friendliness. Cirtec Medical states it develops and scales Class II and III technologies only, runs ISO 14644 Class 7 and 8 cleanrooms, lists IQ, OQ and PQ validation, offers in house EO sterilization at its Costa Rica site, and names emerging startups among its partners. Integer specializes in Class 2 and 3 component and device assembly across 23 manufacturing sites, and it is the only company of the 19 we read that mentions quality agreements at all, as a way to clarify roles and responsibilities. Nordson states Class I, II and III including PMA products, but note that it sold select product lines in its medical contract manufacturing business to Quasar Medical on September 2, 2025, so confirm which entity now runs the process you need.
Where these companies actually build
A US headquarters is rarely the whole footprint. Integer has plants in Juarez, Tijuana, Santo Domingo, Montevideo, Ireland and Penang alongside its US sites. Viant lists Tijuana, Heredia in Costa Rica and Suzhou. TekniPlex, whose contract manufacturing comes largely from Seisa Medical in El Paso, builds in Ciudad Juarez and Slovakia. Cadence runs finished device assembly in Pennsylvania and in Alajuela, Costa Rica. That matters for any made in USA claim, and for cost: a device finished outside the US and shipped in needs a tariff classification before you can price it, so look up the HS code and landed duty for the finished device before you compare a Tijuana quote with an Illinois one.
The terms of sale nobody reads
Two of the firms we read publish terms that decide who owns your tooling. TekniPlex's US sales terms say any mold or tooling, regardless of which party has paid for it, shall be seller property, and allow shipment of up to 10% over or under the ordered quantity. Viant's say seller made tooling is proprietary to the seller. On the other side, Kimball Electronics states that customers own the intellectual property after design acceptance, and Nordson supports custom fluid component tooling for the life of the product, covering maintenance and repair, provided supply contracts are in place.
Tool ownership is the difference between a second source that takes a purchase order and one that takes a new tool plus a repeat of your process validation. Ask about it in the first call, not after the tooling invoice.
Names that have changed
Several companies on older lists no longer trade under the same name. Minnetronix Medical now operates as Forj Medical, which states it builds from 10 units to 10 million with five FDA establishment registrations. SteriPack trades as Ensera. Providien's device assembly, machining and molding business now sits under Amphenol CMT. Donatelle Plastics became part of DuPont in July 2024 and is now part of DuPont Spectrum. Kimball Electronics is rebranding as Kimball Solutions from July 1, 2026. Your quality agreement names a legal entity, so confirm the entity on the ISO 13485 certificate and the FDA registration for the specific site before you sign.
How to choose between them
Start with three filters, in this order. Device class: drop any firm that does not state experience at your class. Stage: for a pilot or clinical build, start with the firms that publish a startup or low volume stance. Location: if the device must be made in the US, keep only the firms that publish a US only footprint or can name a US site for your build.
Then send every survivor the same brief and ask the same five questions: the NRE for design transfer and validation, separate from unit price; who owns the tooling and design outputs; which site builds it and that site's registration; the annual volume the price assumes; and when the lead time starts counting. Because none of these companies publishes a price, comparable answers are the only way to compare them. If the device has molded silicone or electronic subassemblies, the same brief can go to custom rubber and silicone molders or electronics contract manufacturers for a make versus buy check on those components.
Shortlist the right contract manufacturer in one brief
Suppliers is an AI sourcing agent. Describe your device, its class and regulatory path, the processes it needs, your pilot and production quantities, and where it has to be built. The agent shortlists medical device contract manufacturing companies that fit, shows their published terms side by side with registration and ISO 13485 evidence where available, and sends one consistent request for quote through our RFQ tool so every proposal answers the same questions. You pay a flat monthly fee, there is no commission on the order, and you contract with the manufacturer directly. A human on your side reviews the evidence, audits the finalists and decides.
Frequently asked questions
Which medical device contract manufacturers work with startups?
Nortech Systems, Medical Murray, Viant and Pathway MedTech all state it in writing. Nortech lets startups without a mature quality system use its ISO 13485 development system, Medical Murray runs single lot pilot builds for clinical trials, Viant supports low volume prototype runs, and Pathway is built for volumes too small for traditional contract manufacturers.
How much do medical device contract manufacturing companies charge?
None of the 19 companies we read publishes an NRE fee, a unit price or a minimum for a custom device. Pricing is quoted per project and, as Viant's terms state, is based on assumptions about annual volume, minimums and tooling. Ask every firm to separate NRE from unit price and to state the volume the price assumes.
Which medical device contract manufacturers build only in the USA?
Medical Murray (two Illinois sites), Pathway MedTech (Santee, California) and HDA Technology (Lake Forest, California) publish US only footprints. Most large firms, including Integer, Viant, TekniPlex, Nortech and Cadence, also run plants in Mexico, Costa Rica, Asia or Europe, so ask which site each quote is for.
Who owns the tooling at a medical device contract manufacturer?
It depends on the terms of sale. TekniPlex's published terms make tooling seller property regardless of who paid, and Viant's say seller made tooling is proprietary to the seller. Kimball states customers own the IP after design acceptance. Agree tooling and design ownership in writing before you approve a tooling invoice.
Which are the largest medical device contract manufacturing companies?
Jabil, Flex, Sanmina, Plexus, Integer and Viant run the largest networks among the companies we read, with dozens of ISO 13485 sites between them across the Americas, Europe and Asia. Their websites publish no startup program and no pricing, so they suit established programs at volume more than first pilot builds.
Suppliers · Get started
Put this into practice with an AI sourcing agent
Describe what you need to make or buy in plain English, and the AI finds, vets, and shortlists qualified manufacturers, with quotes, MOQs, and lead-times compared side by side, then helps you run RFQs and POs in one place. Flat price, no per-deal commission.